Regarding a previous undeclared and illegal "war" a few dozen years ago waged for the same client as the present one in West Asia. Scott was the BDA Officer.
Once upon a time there was a Battle Damage Assessment (BDA) Officer.
In a long ago war, this BDA Officer was ordered to assess damage done against Iraqi SCUD missiles.
When the General wanted to tell the President that his fancy new F-15E Strike Eagles had destroyed all of Iraq’s fixed SCUD launchers, the BDA Officer had to inform him that the evidence showed none had been destroyed.
This made the General angry.
Later the General went on national television to report that his fancy F-15E aircraft had destroyed seven mobile SCUD launchers.
But the BDA Officer had to tell the General that these were only civilian fuel trucks.
The General was so angry he fired the BDA Officer.
But back in Washington DC the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff reviewed the BDA Officer’s report, and has his specialists examine the evidence.
The specialists reported that the BDA Officer was right.
The General had to give the BDA Officer his job back.
The General was then told that his super duper ultra secret commando force had destroyed a SCUD launchers.
But the BDA Officer, after examining the evidence, concluded that the super duper ultra secret commandos had only killed a decoy launcher.
The General got so mad he had the BDA Officer arrested.
The BDA Officer was released only when the evidence, upon review, confirmed his assessment.
The moral of the story?
Believe the professionals.
Leave BDA to the professionals.
Don’t believe the Generals.
Or Defense Secretary.
Or White House Press Secretary.
Or the President.
Because they aren’t professional BDA Officers.
They are politicians.
And politicians lie.